1366

Other topics / Halloween Boo

« on: October 15, 2015, 03:18:16 PM »

About the Halloween Boo

You know Halloween and you know boo, so you probably know Halloween boo?
 Some of you need these:

• Halloween boo letter
• Halloween boo poem
• Halloween boo game
• Halloween boo signs
• Halloween boo images
• Halloween boo basket
• Halloween boo... etc.

Well, I may be useful about the Halloween boo sign like this: -- Halloween ghost, Halloween pumpkin (Jack-o-lantern), Halloween bats and a 'Boo!'... isn't it a good Halloween Boo sign?
 You may tell me what do you think about it! Thank you in advance!

1367

Other topics / Promovate01, Storeforlol -- accounts deleted

« on: October 12, 2015, 09:07:21 PM »

Promovate01, Storeforlol -- deleted

  Promovate01, Storeforlol -- accounts deleted. REASONS: no posts, multi-accounting!

1368

Other topics / clydekk18, corneliatx16 -- accounts deleted

« on: October 03, 2015, 08:47:41 AM »

clydekk18, corneliatx16 -- deleted

  clydekk18, corneliatx16 -- accounts deleted. REASONS: no posts, multi-accounting! (As usual. )

1369

Internet / ASCII pig

« on: October 03, 2015, 04:28:11 AM »

If you need some ASCII piggy, here you may find one: ASCII pig.

1370

Internet / ASCII pig face

« on: October 03, 2015, 04:23:42 AM »

↖(^ω^)↗

Lovely, happy, hugging (?) piglet (an ASCII pig)! An average sized ↖(^ω^)↗ and a big sized: ↖(^ω^)↗.

1371

Other topics / johnparker92 -- account deleted

« on: September 29, 2015, 03:20:10 AM »

johnparker92 -- deleted

  johnparker92 -- account deleted. REASONS: no posts and multi-accounting.

1372

Other topics / "You can't have your cake and eat it"

« on: September 29, 2015, 02:16:01 AM »

 I'm reading about a popular English idiomatic proverb (or figure of speech): "You can't have your cake and eat it". More about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_can't_have_your_cake_and_eat_it

1373

Philosophy / Re: Are you a realistic person?

« on: September 28, 2015, 08:43:18 PM »

  I'd like to be a realistic person and I think I'm... at least, almost realistic.

1374

Интернет / Бан список

« on: September 28, 2015, 08:39:51 PM »

Бан список.

1375

Other topics / Toasakii -- account banned

« on: September 28, 2015, 08:34:55 PM »

Toasakii -- banned

  Toasakii -- banned. REASONS:

• Bot (or bot-like) posts.
• Post in English in the Russian section.

Welcome to our big ban list of seo-forum-seo-luntan.com!

1376

Интернет / Бан

« on: September 28, 2015, 08:29:23 PM »

 Бан.

1377

Philosophy / Bot or bot-like

« on: September 28, 2015, 08:27:15 PM »

 Oh, bot or bot-like post. I think soon you'll be in our BAN list.

1378

Other topics / Re: An answer to Ulu-Mulu-no-die from Voat.co

« on: September 25, 2015, 04:30:49 AM »

Ulu-Mulu-no-die from Voat.co, yes, it's a nice picture. But no one here is a tailor. Nobody should go back to his/her needlework. We just use the centimeter tape to measure the size of the muscles.

Looks like Ulu-Mulu-no-die is a troll. At least.

1379

Social network | SEO - Social network / Re: Answers to the crazy stupid flussence from Voat.co

« on: September 25, 2015, 03:57:55 AM »

  He is making some new desperate lies/innuendoes in v/whatever and I'm going to response to this here:
 1. "In all seriousness, he's a completely autistic lolcow."

 In all seriousness, flussence is a completely ignorant schizophrenic (or at least a psychopath). He has no idea what is "autistic" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_spectrum)and he admits that he has social anxiety (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_anxiety_disorder). Also he is the one, who sent criminal threads, floods of fake spam reports, innuendoes, etc.


 2. "Doesn't understand sarcasm, satire or any form of wit."

I understand them and I even learned about them, but yours (if there are any) are idiotic, psychopathic...

 3. "So easy to drive up the wall. Imagine most of SBBH's posts, but taken out of context and 100% deathly serious all of the time."

 Oh, really? Imagine most of the brain of flussence is ill brain. Very serious problem.

 4. "He's so fucking obnoxious he and his alts are the only people ever banned from SBBH for non-ironic reasons."

 Haha. Argumentum ad ban in some SBBH shitpost subverse? Sounds legit!

 5. "And he totally deserves it for: spamming this entire site for a month straight, making approximately a dozen whiny threads per sub he got banned from, abusing the system to hide from downvotes, declaring he's LEEVING 4EVA OMG with another flood of a dozen threads, then staying to continue spamming regardless."

 Insane person!
a) I/we didn't spam, because we kept the rule up to 2/10. This rule is simple, short and clear in voat.co/help/faq: "To be on the safe side, if you submit 10 links to various subverses on Voat, at most 2 of the 10 submitted links may be to the sites you are associated with."
b) Whiny is what you're trying to make. You are desperate and you're seeking for every chance to organize something against me/us. After the downvote brigading is not working as you imagined, now you're trying to convince mamwad from Voat.co to give our subs "the mamwad makeover next"... Idiotism and psychopathism.
c) The one who is abusing the system is not the one, who hides from the downvotes, but the one, who is doing the DOWNVOTE BRIGADES, psycho!
d) LOL! We almost left. No more contributing for Voat.co. We only finish some answers and some reposts and making some screenshots. We're done!
 
 6. "The middle one was what started this shit tornado by being a little bitch on FPH and whining around the rest of the site."
 Sure, the ill brain flussence didn't get it. The little bitch was the insulter Harry_Areola, who broke the peace rule there. Then the main admin banned us and sent us mother insults. As people with mothers who are not alive, we had to react to this in some way. But person (crazy person), without any morals like you surely can't get it.

7. "Then a few days later the first one shows up defending him (in the same broken english) and a few people connected the dots to figure out they've been SEO-spamming the shit out of this place."

 We're relatives and colleagues. Of course we can cooperate in this honest way. I don't see something wrong.
 About the spam -- we never spam, because we kept the up to 20% rule mentioned above.
 This website is not just an SEO website, it's an omnilogy international forum -- one of the leading websites in the world. Check this out: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/seo-forum-seo-luntan.com#trafficstats

 8. "The pair of them instantly went nuclear and somewhere in the middle of it the third sockpuppet showed up defending them."

 We defend each other, when we're right. At the same time we're people with dignity and we may say 'sorry' (as we did) every time, when it is necessary.

 9. "They all use identical tactics, which leads most of us to think they're actually one person."

 Well, we suggested many times to organize a Video Conference in Skype, but the cowards like flussence never accepted this good idea!

He (flussence) even has no idea what is the difference between  spam, off-topic, shitpost, etc. (About the last term you may learn online: http://global.bing.com/search?q=shitpost&qs=n&pq=shitpost&sc=8-7&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=2b35a551df05434ba72020c663212874&setmkt=en-us&setlang=en-us&FORM=SECNEN )... a serious psycho case, isn't he?

He has a crazy idea, that even people who keep the current anti-spam rules are... 'SEO spammers'. Pity boy.

1380

Other topics / An observation

« on: September 24, 2015, 11:58:01 PM »

 I'm getting active acquisition of information from a primary source, i.e. an observation.