The incels calling themselves "sub-human" are wrong
First of all, the word "sub-human"/"subhuman" is not very correct because it implies that there is something that is human and not that human or something like this. Are there sub-foxes, sub-wolves, sub-elephants, sub-crocodiles, sub-bats or sub-dolphins? Obviously not. There may be smaller, weaker, disabled or ill foxes, wolves, elephants, etc., but they're still foxes, wolves, elephants and so on. That's why "sub-human"/"subhuman" is nothing but a senseless concept (or even worse -- a Nazi concept), which is useless and harmful.
And here come some concrete examples with people who are 100% human (even above the human average, but I'll not call them "super-human"/"superhuman") and who are provenly (without doubt) heroes in the mankind history because they contributed a lot for its development (even without being "Chads", "Changs", "Chadpreets", "Tyrones" and even many persons today may consider them as "ugly", "normies", "shortcels", "baldcels", etc.):
1. Albert Einstein (height: 5 feet 9 inches) -- a German-born theoretical physicist universally acknowledged to be one of the greatest physicists of all time:
2. Vladimir Lenin (height 5 feet 5 inches) -- a philosopher, revolutionary, politician who created the biggest country in the mankind history -- the USSR:
3. Mahatma Gandhi (height: 5 feet 5 inches) -- anti-colonial nationalist, and political ethicist, who employed nonviolent resistance to lead the successful campaign for India's independence from British rule, and in turn inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world:
4. Kurt Huber (height: ?) -- a university professor and resistance fighter with the anti-Nazi group White Rose: By Bundesarchiv, Bild 146II-744 / CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-SA 3.0 de, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5420160
There are hundreds of examples like these. They're showing us that the physical attributes like hair, height, skin, frame, etc. are not the ones which make you "more human" or "less human". All these are mostly animalish, biological. But a human is something (at least, a bit) beyond other animals and the difference is in its more developed thinking (science, technology, philosophy, etc.) and society. So even you're one of those who are without a partner (girlfriend, boyfriend, lover, husband, wife, or something like these) you're not a "sub-", you're still one of the mankind.
Author: Geser Kurultaev (a philosopher-anthropologist, author of "How to Escape the Inceldom: A QUICK GUIDE TO Deincelization
" -- https://www.amazon.com/How-Escape-Inceldom-QUICK-Deincelization-ebook/dp/B0855FTRZ1