« Reply #174 on: November 30, 2015, 05:37:47 AM »
From v/AskVoat:
2 hatred sentences = high CCP. Any better idea for determination the value of the voaters? (self.AskVoat)
submitted 3 months ago by Georgi
A man told me it's better to post it here, so I'm posting it here, too. HERE WE GO:
There is a user (https://voat.co/user/Harry_Areola) who insulted me and cursed me (because 'I don't hate fat people.'). (He is an active member of the subverse fatpeoplehate and he posts almost only there). Today I decided to check his CCP (Comment Contribution Points) and his TOP 2 were this:
------- 107 points for "Mercy for a fat? You're slipping, my shitlord friend."
--------- 91 points for "Then why are you throwing a conniption fit, fatass?"
As you can see, these sentences aren't useful and they're full of hate and aggression. BUT for someone his CCP will matters. For me, it just means that CCP means nothing. AND CAN'T BE A MEASURE FOR THE USER'S VALUE.
Any better idea for determination of the real value of the voaters?
14 comments save edit delete
From v/whatever:
2 hate aggressive comments = 198 CCP (Comment Contribution Points). Yes, it's possible. Any ideas for better measure of the voaters' value? (self.whatever)
submitted 3 months ago by Georgi
There is a user (https://voat.co/user/Harry_Areola) who insulted me and cursed me (because 'I don't hate fat people.'). (He is an active member of the subverse fatpeoplehate and he posts almost only there). Today I decided to check his CCP (Comment Contribution Points) and his TOP 2 were this:
--> 107 points for "Mercy for a fat? You're slipping, my shitlord friend."
--> 91 points for "Then why are you throwing a conniption fit, fatass?"
As you can see, these sentences aren't useful and they're full of hate and aggression. BUT for someone his CCP will matters. For me, it just means that CCP means nothing. AND CAN'T BE A MEASURE FOR THE USER'S VALUE.
Any better idea for determination of the real value of the voaters?
37 comments save edit delete
From v/ideasforvoat:
High CCP (Comment Contribution Points) due to hate speech and dirty words? Yes, it's possible and it shows CCP means nothing here. Any better idea? (self.ideasforvoat)
submitted 3 months ago by Georgi
There is a user (https://voat.co/user/Harry_Areola) who insulted me and cursed me (because 'I don't hate fat people.'). (He is an active member of the subverse fatpeoplehate and he posts almost only there). Today I decided to check his CCP (Comment Contribution Points) and his TOP 2 were this:
107 points for "Mercy for a fat? You're slipping, my shitlord friend."
91 points for "Then why are you throwing a conniption fit, fatass?"
As you can see, these sentences aren't useful and they're full of hate and aggression. BUT for someone his CCP will matters. For me, it just means that CCP means nothing. AND CAN'T BE A MEASURE FOR THE USER'S VALUE.
Any better idea for determination of the real value of the voaters?
8 comments save edit delete
From v/thedinnertable:
Males are cooking at home. Good or bad? (self.thedinnertable)
submitted 3 months ago by Georgi
I know some guys, who are very macho-man, so they think to cook at home is something like the worst male ever. But many others like to cook or at least to help their wives in cooking. How do you think? Oh, and a recent picture I like about the cooking dads -- very funny: http://www.seo-forum-seo-luntan.com/food/cooking-humor/msg24545/#msg24545
22 comments save edit delete
From v/AskVoat:
Which subverse is the worse according to your Voat experience? (self.AskVoat)
submitted 3 months ago by Georgi
I like Voat currently, but I had already very bad experience with a subverse (fatpeoplehate). There a member started to insult me and to curse me and after the report to the mod, the mod himself sent me a PM with insults about my dead mother. Which subverse you think is the worse OR/AND which one made you feel very bad? EDIT: 'WORST', not 'WORSE'... Sorry for the error!
5 comments save edit delete
« Last Edit: November 30, 2015, 07:15:44 AM by Non-SEO »
Logged
A fan of science, philosophy and so on.