☯☼☯ SEO and Non-SEO (Science-Education-Omnilogy) Forum ☯☼☯



☆ ☆ ☆ № ➊ Omnilogic Forum + More ☆ ☆ ☆

Your ad here just for $2 per day!

- - -

Your ads here ($2/day)!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MSL

3601
Social network | SEO - Social network / Re: What's a "Gigachad"
« on: September 03, 2020, 04:42:31 AM »
A simple combination of "giga-" and "Chad". "Giga" has a Greek origin - (γίγας's meaning is "giant"). "Chad" is an alpha male (according to some incels' jargon). Well, so it's, according to those who use this kind of slang, a person who is one of the top Chads.
 Now let me read that explanation above and comment it.
 1. "0.1%"? Sounds possible. Especially nowadays when there are so many obese people and/or people who don't sport at all. Maybe the real percentage of the so-called Gigachads is something close to 0.01% or 0.001%?
 2. "intimidates most men by his muscular physique" is too primitive. Not everyone with a super-muscular physique is that aggressive; not everyone with not that muscular body is weak. In many situations/relationships the psysique isn't that important (for example if the "weak guy" is a boss and the muscular guy is his worker.)
 3. About the so-called "mog" (a.k.a. "mogging" which is a verbification and apheresis of the acronym AMOG = "alpha male of the group") is the act of dominating another person or just being better than that person. So, as we may see, sometimes the other types of males are more attractive (for example some of the so-called "slayers", "pretty boys", etc.)
 4. "An allosexual hetero woman's reaction to seeing the Gigachad is the equivalent to how moths react to a lightbulb." is more or less exaggerated. I know that there are girls and women who afraid of the Gigachad type males and they prefer moderate muscular types; some even like feminine males and there are even those who search for chubby and fatty males. So, I can guess that being so giga- isn't the best option and maybe not more than 40%-45% of the females will choose a Gigachad.  :) :)

3602
SEO / Re: Bounce Rate is an ranking factor or not
« on: September 02, 2020, 03:56:55 PM »
can any one explain clearly regarding this rather than 2 word's, in google i found so many stores regarding bounce rate

Stores? They sell it already in the stores? :o Wow! It should be a good business to sell bounce rate. ;D

Seriously now, you're doing SEO and you really still wonder what's a bounce rate? It's just shows how many people are visiting your website/webpage/channel/etc. and soon after it leaving (because, probably, they're not interested).

3603
Other languages / Какво е "енджой"
« on: August 31, 2020, 09:46:26 AM »

За "енджой"


 Ако става дума за "Енджой" (това е "N-JOY"), което е радиостанция. Да, но когато е написано само с малки букви - "енджой" - най-често се касае за неправилното (неправилно транскрибираното) английско "инджой" (то се пише така "enjoy" и се произнася така [ɪnˈdʒɔɪ], т. е. като "инджой", а не като "енджой"). Да, транслитерацията на думата е "енджой" или "енжой" (в зависимост как иска някой да транслитерира "j"-то), обаче транскрибцията (и произношението) трябва да са "инджой".
 Когато става дума за правилно произнасяне на английски думи винаги е добре да се правят справки, понеже английският не е фонетичен език, какъвто е до голяма степен латинският (а също българският).

3604

Your account has been suspended (Ref - 04221008702)

"Your account has been suspended (Ref - 04221008702)
Aug 28 at 5:43 PM
PrintRaw message

service@paypaI.com <vbmwsil1yv5uy0l-gqtgsv2dscb2rf42@cv31amit-67408334.it>
...

𝖣𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝖢𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗋,

𝖸𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖯𝖺𝗒𝖯𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗍 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗍𝖾𝖽. 𝖶𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗎𝗇𝖽 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗎𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝗈𝗇 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗄𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖯𝖺𝗒𝖯𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗍. 𝖸𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗈𝗐𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖽.

 𝖳𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗇 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗍 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗒, 𝗉𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗒.

𝖫𝗈𝗀 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗒𝖯𝖺𝗅

𝖠𝖿𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝖺𝗌𝗄, 𝗐𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗇𝗍 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼𝗍 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗂𝗍𝗌 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗌 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇 𝟧 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖽𝖺𝗒𝗌.

𝖳𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗄 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆."

My answer: "Wow! Such a surprise! I didn't know that PayPal has a new email. This vbmWsil1YV5uY0L-GqTgsV2DSCB2rf42@cv31aMiT-67408334.it is a really cool choice! "  ;D ;D ;D

3605
 I think that it's very rare someone to be a fully omega. Let's say you're the worst in running, but you can be the best in chess. Another example -- one is not good at singing, but he is good at coding.
 Another thing is that even there are some real "omegas" this doesn't make them automatically incels (mancels). Not every omega male is an incel and not every incel is an omega. The reality is that there are some persons who are good enough to be called at least betas (beta males) and they're incels. And also there are some persons who are unlucky and/or lazy enough to be something that many will call it "omega", but still they were capable to find a girl-friend, a wife, a lover. So an "omega male" isn't necessarily a mancel (incel) and an incel isn't necessarily an "omega" ("omega male"). 
 The last thing that I want to add is that there are many other ways and examples about how someone may seek to improve his social standing. (And, in fact, I don't think that becoming a homosexual (gay) or bisexual is "improving the social standing").

3606
Once a person becomes very bald better to shave all his hair regularly and to be a skinhead fashioned. Wear good hats and caps too. The second thing is to try to get richer. It helps in this capitalistic oriented world. The third point is never stop the good job -- keep learning, keep working, keep training... and keep trying.

3607
Internet / Interrobang -- ‽
« on: August 28, 2020, 04:26:42 AM »

Interrobang (‽)


The interrobang: . Big one -- .

More about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrobang.

3608
Internet / Mushroom Emoji: 🍄
« on: August 28, 2020, 03:27:53 AM »

🍄


The mushroom emoji: 🍄. Big one -- 🍄. Pretty! :)

3609
Social network | SEO - Social network / Re: Do you want to be famous?
« on: August 28, 2020, 01:45:29 AM »
An online friend said about it: " 😞 very sad, and it's sad to see that a hardworking guy doesn't get what he deserves. It's ok, it surely will come one day, I'm sure. By the way, how much does YouTube pay you? I know that you don't care about YouTube ads, but I'll disable my AdBlock while watching your video to support you. Wishing you good luck! 🤞" and I answered: "... yes. The problem is when there is no initial capital to start a business, then you're always poor. If I had the money I could make a special restaurant or a private school and problem solved. :) My videos are getting a few hundred views per day (for example 200 or 300) and it pays me several cents per day. For example 0.04 or 0.28 (this kind of income per day; nothing special, but I like it because it's better than nothing :) )."

3610
Plants / Re: Pineberry
« on: August 27, 2020, 05:57:13 AM »
I wish I could taste a pineberry at least once. :)

3611
Social network | SEO - Social network / Do you want to be famous?
« on: August 27, 2020, 05:07:55 AM »

Do you want to be famous?


I'd like to be famous. (Of course, I mean famous in a good or in a neutral way, not in a bad way.) I wish I can become famous because it's good for me. I will explain it: I hope I can become famous and then to become rich because now I live a poor life in a 31 sq. m. apartment and I have an unstable income of around USD 400/month. It's a life of a comparatively poor precariat. (The meaning of it is "people whose employment and income are insecure, especially when considered as a class.")

3612
Other topics / What is "piapa"?
« on: August 25, 2020, 01:13:33 AM »

Piapa


What is "piapa"?

3613
EARN MONEY / "AGENCY"
« on: August 23, 2020, 01:28:37 AM »
"AGENCY
Aug 21 at 7:56 PM

Info Desk <infom0007@gmail.com>

Dear Sir/Ma.

My name is Mr. George Mudumela" a senior government official in
Department of Public Works & Housing for the Republic of South Africa
and the Chief of Staff in charge for contracts awards execution and
supervision of all contracts in the Ministry of works & Housing. In
2017, I personally monitored and supervised the awarded contracts for
supplies of building materials and constructions of ultra modern
shopping malls, low cost housing units, airports maintenance and
Stadiums to Improve the standard of leaving in this country, In the
Eastern Cape, Western Cape, Natal and Gauteng provinces here in South
Africa.

My colleague and I serving in the board deliberately inflated and over
invoiced the contract sum, leaving an excess of US$30, 000,000.00
(Thirty Million United States Dollars Only). At the completion of the
contract, the real contract sum was paid to the original contractors,
leaving the excess, which we reported to the Government that it
belonged to the sub-contractor that handled part of the original
contract. But the company we submitted as the beneficiary was
non-existing foreign company, which was a purported attempt by us to
divert the money for our private use. I do not intend to mince words
with you, I have to tell you the truth; this is a deal but completely
risk-free and genuine because the contract has been perfectly and
genuinely executed and completed. It depends on whether you are
interested or not.

Right now this amount is due for payment and is floating in the
treasury not attached to anyone/company. We are only two people who
know the origin of this fund. But we cannot claim it by ourselves
because we are civil servants therefore we are looking for a
trustworthy foreign company / individual whose name can be used to
claim this money for our mutual benefit.

This is strictly a business deal, but it’s completely risk-free and
secure because we will use our official positions to source all the
necessary approvals, official documents and certificates that will
back up the fund to reflect that you/your company genuinely executed
and completed the contract. All necessary arrangements have been put
in place in all the relevant departments for immediate approval of
this payment.

For your co-operation, we have agreed to offer you 2.5% of the entire
amount on conclusion of the transaction while 75% will be for us.
Please if you are interested in this proposal, I want you to respond
immediately through my personal email & telephone number stated below
for further information and directives.

This transaction is expected to be completed within 7 or 10 work days
and is highly confidential and discreet. Thank you for your
co-operation. Your urgent reply is awaited through my private email
accounts below.

Best Regards,

Mr. George Mudumela.
Private Email: geomudoni@gmail.com
(Department Of Public Works (S.A)"

My answer:

"What an incredible offer! I was waiting for it like all my life! I'm so poor and I need so much to be rich! At last it'll be possible now! Waiting for your good money!" ;D

3614
Plants / The Blackberry Cycle Video
« on: August 19, 2020, 06:28:25 AM »

3615
Electronics / About the flying cars
« on: August 18, 2020, 03:10:47 AM »

Flying cars


  We submitted in another website (Reddit) a link from Wikipedia about the first flying car (Aerocar). I mean this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerocar. Well, it was removed and the explanation was "Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, your submission has been removed.
Please read the removal notice carefully. Your post falls into one or more (but not necessarily all) of the following categories:
No memes or low-effort/low-quality posts or comments. This includes copypasta, shitposting, and trolling. Posts designed to be hate-fests or troll-baiting are considered "trolling" and will be removed.
Memes are welcome in r/carmemes.
Please read the rules and the chain of action regarding removed submissions and moderator actions before continuing to post. If you have any questions, please read the rules first and feel free to message the mods if you still have concerns."

We decided to ask more, so we sent that: "Hello! I shared an article from Wikipedia about the first real flying car. And it was deleted because it's a "meme" or something like this. It was a mistake or not? Just trying to figure out this rule."

The answer was: "Hi there,
Our sidebar says: "We try to be a helpful discussion-driven community while maintaining high-quality discourse and topical content."
Reposting a wiki page is extremely low effort."

Then we explained this: "Hi! Thanks for the answer! I wanted to see what people think about it -- why there are so many flying cars (since that time) and we can't buy one still, so I shared this link to show them how long ago it's already possible to combine a car with a plane. Hoped there will be some interesting discussion. :) May I post it as a question then?"

The answer was: "A complete title and fleshed out post body with a few links would certainly go a long way to satisfying the requirements." (plus something about another subreddit) and then we posted a question about the flying cars: "When we can drive flying cars?" A quote:
Quote
When we can drive flying cars?
When we're going to have the chance to drive flying cars? The first one was produced in the '50s. So it's possible. Where is the problem?
(By the way, now we see that the first one was produced even earlier: "Jess Dixon's flying automobile c. 1940": Kobel Feature Photos (Frankfort, Indiana) / State Archives of Florida, Florida Memory
original description: "Built by Jess Dixon of Andalusia, Alabama. Can fly forward, backward or straight up or hover in the air. Runs on road or flys across country. 40 H.P. motor, air cooled, speeds to 100 m.p.h."
).

And we got some interesting (and some reasonable) answers. Here I'll summarize the important points:

 1. "Buy a helicopter." It's not the same. A flying car means something that one can fly and something that one also can drive (when it's necessary).

 2. "A flying car is just a plane." I don't think so. Of course, this kind of definition is possible, but the flying cars are something different. I prefer this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roadable_aircraft -- it "combines the flying capability of an aircraft with the option of being driven as an automobile on the ground."

 3. "When they drive themselves." It's a good idea, but I think it should be implemented to the nowadays "classic" cars too because the normal AI is going to prevent much more car incidents.

 4. "The cost
The maintenance
The safe usage of
The noise
The lack of regulatory guidance" -- 1. I don't know why a flying car should be more costly, but let's suppose it's so; this will make no big difference as far as there are people who like cars and who'll buy flying cars too. 2. The maintenance. I'm sure that even if from the beginning it'll be not so easy, after 1-2 years people will start to do it well. 3. Safety first. I do agree. Probably it may be more dangerous, especially if there are many flying cars in the same area at the same time. Depends on the management. 4. Noise? Here I'm not sure, but I may suppose that it's not necessarily more noise than a "classic" car. 5. The regulatory guidance is a big problem, but it's easy soluble.

5. About these "... I thank God we don't have flying cars... People have a hard enough time as it is commanding a car on a 2D plane, the heard would definitely be culled if this was opened up to 3D" and "When people can prove they can handle driving on roads first." -- All I can say is that I hope that if there are flying cars for sale they'll be with a good AI that will make them as safe as possible!

6. "The problem is you cannot make a reliable, easy to "drive" flying car and they would not be safe. This isn't Back to the Future this is real life." -- Probably this may be the main problem. I'm not sure.

7. "... It’s not the technology holding us back, it’s the practicality of it. Imagine if every time you went to work in the morning you had to get permission from air traffic control and do a bunch of preflight checks. Everyone would be late all the time. And there would have to be some kind of organization for traffic or else people would just be flying into each other all the time or entering no fly zones or annoying people by flying over their houses. And if you’re gonna organize traffic into air roads, then what’s the problem with ground roads? Flying cars just don’t make sense for the real world." -- This is exactly what I think -- the technology already should be good enough (in 2020-2021). But I think that all these problems mentioned above are soluble with good laws, organization and management.

8. "... anything fitting this description will either be a shitty car or a shitty airplane, or possibly both. The differences between the two transportation modes are simply too vast to properly address in a single vehicle.
To get more specific, a lot of design work goes into keeping airplanes as lightweight as possible. More weight affects an airplane's performance far, far more than it does a car. And this is an especially large concern when you're designing an airplane that will have systems that are literally dead weight while it's flying - that is, everything related to it being roadworthy." -- I'm not so good in this engineering science, so I can't comment professionally it, but I post it here because it looks like a good argument so far.

9. "Can you imagine the amount of people who would text and fly?" -- In my personal opinion texting/chatting and driving/flying should be forbidden. Of course, if the flying cars are 100% "auto" (with the mentioned AI above), then it's okay because the driver/the pilot will be like e passenger and then he/she will be free to text/chat/sleep/etc.

10. "I’m a bit worried about safety. Imagine how catastrophic traffic will be in the air." -- Me too. But with good regulations and good AI it can't be a problem in my opinion.

11. "Airspace is so tightly controlled around anywhere you’d want to fly one to avoid traffic." -- The best option. This is the optimistic version that I want to believe may come true. :) 8)

...

Your ad here just for $1 per day!

- - -

Your ads here ($1/day)!

About the privacy policy
How Google uses data when you use our partners’ sites or apps
Post there to report content which violates or infringes your copyright.