Metapill
What's the metapill theory
Geser Kurultaev's incels'
metapill theory which is related with his philosophy of
atleastism is easy to understand. Here it will be presented in a nutshell:
1. Every "pill" (whitepill, blackpill, redpill, bluepill, etc.) points to different sides of the inceldom. There is no "perfect pill". That's why, from the scientific point of view, we have to be objective and, according to the facts, to take every true part of the concrete pills and to reject the parts that are not true.
For example, the metapill is using the realism of the redpill, part of the pessimism of the blackpill and part of the optimism of the bluepill. The metapill accepts that in some inceldom cases the situation may be almost "It's over." (for example, if there is a disabledcel) but it also knows that it's not over at all in many other cases (like, for example, if there is a fatcel because every one can lose weight). If the bluepill is too optimistic, the redpill is realistic and the blackpill is pessimistic, then we can say that the metapill is something between realistic to moderately optimistic. The metapill also accepts the whitepill ideas of becoming more emotionally stable and to have more philosophical attitude and it follows closely the centrism and the balance of the purplepill.
2. The moderate optimism of the metapill is based on some facts like these:
2.1. Even incels who do not work hard on their self-improvement and becoming a better version of themselves sometimes are ascending.
2.2. A big part of the incels who really do their best to become a better version of themselves (via different -maxxes like gymmaxx, studymaxx, knowledgemaxx, skillmaxx, moneymaxx, locationmaxx, etc.) are surely ascending.
2.3. Most of the incels (especially those who're still teenagers and college students) are not truecels. The truecel is someone who really has nearly 0 chance even after a lot of hard trying to ascend -- for example someone who is very, very short or very mentally disordered. But most of the self-proclaimed incels are just 1, 2 or 3 steps away from the escape of their inceldom. Practically, around 6 of 10 incels, can become enough attractive if they improve their body (gymmaxx), their status (money, job/business, etc.) and their knowledge (plus personality -- for example to become less selfish, less hostile, more gentle and respectful).
2.4. The Matthew rule -- "For to those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away." which means that if a person is getting richer, stronger, more clever, more popular, etc. he will receive more benefits and results in his life than if he is getting poorer, weaker, stupider, infamous, etc.
2.5. The base of the metapill -- the atleastism -- states that at least we should do our best because "the hard work pays off". The idea is that if you don't -minn yourself (with bad habits, drugs, crimes and so on) and you do -maxx yourself (with healthy food, good hygiene, sports, learning, earning money and so on) then you can gain some points in the decile scale of attractiveness. For example a 1/10 may become a 4/10 (i. e. a truecel may become a sort of normie), a 4/10 may become a 8/10 (i. e. a normie may become a Chadlide). This is the moderate optimism and the realism of the metapill. It's not promising everyone to become a Chad but it's promising that there is no way to, at least, obtain more value and to have high real chances to ascend (to escape the inceldom).
Show Posts
Obviously it's some kind of popular, circulating joke because right now in workjoke.com I found a similar one -- "What's the difference between a philosopher and an engineer? About 50,000 a year."
