☯☼☯ SEO and Non-SEO (Science-Education-Omnilogy) Forum ☯☼☯



☆ ☆ ☆ № ➊ Omnilogic Forum + More ☆ ☆ ☆

Your ad here just for $2 per day!

- - -

Your ads here ($2/day)!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MSL

2266
Other topics / Re: Do you stutter?
« on: October 22, 2022, 05:57:07 AM »
 No, but I had a classmate who did.
 Maybe you should practice some sentences without stuttering at home and step by step you'll get rid of it in the real communications too. Wish you good luck!

2268

About the complex of inferiority "younger than me but surpasses me"


  It's not only a pure incels' phenomenon. There are plenty of noncels, incels in denial, nearcels and others who had this complex (or at least short time feeling, thoughts) like "I am elder and I should be x (taller, stronger, more clever, etc.) but he/she surpasses me!" The difference is that some of the incels can describe it in other ways like "My younger cousin mogs me.", "My younger brother already mogs me.", "Even the teenagers around are mogging me.", "My students mog me already." and so on.
 Why does this happen? The reason is the belief that "elder age = always better" which is only partly true. The elder age = more time to develop and of course more experience, hence in some cases it's a plus but not every time. For example if you spent your recent 5 years in playing video games and online complaining and meanwhile a younger person spent the same time (or even less time, for example -- 2 years only) to practice bodybuilding and a foreign language, then no wonder that he has a way better body and foreign language skills. Also there are some genetic traits which aren't very related to the age -- like the height, for example (yes, when he or she is 3 y. o. surely will be shorter than you but if his/her genetic height is "very tall" it will appear even before the puberty and when he/she is 10 y. o. you may see that the young person is already surpassing you especially if you're not very tall.)
 So, as usual, all you should do is to try being a better version of yourself -- improve the things that you can improve (like your weight, muscles, knowledge and so on) and accept the things that you can't improve (like height, male pattern balding, etc.). It'll make you much better than someone who isn't improved (maxx-ed) and who on top of that has a complex of inferiority.
 Do your best.

2269
 In the worst cases some even use drugs, ruin their bodies and then complain why they can't ascend. Terribly poor life choices and low IQs.

2270
 A GigaChad grandfather would say many incels! :)
 For those who're not familiar with the slang -- a GigaChad (or Gigachad) is something like these men: (Ernest Khalimov and Batyr Suleymanov).

2271

Brush you teeth! Don't believe it's just a cope!


  I saw something comparatively new that is circulating in some blackpilled (pessimistic and negative) incels. It's that brushing teeth is a cope, it's useless and so on! Total desinformation and disgusting idea! Don't believe it and never neglect your oral hygiene! The bad oral hygiene (and the bad hygiene at all) usually is a 100/100 reason someone to be rejected (even when he is some Chad-tier) because nobody can stand a smelly, stinky, ill person.
 The good hygiene helps you to be healthier, younger (biological age), more attractive and it's a base for your further self-improvement.

2272
 Oh, yes, this is what I read before -- some historians noticed that the descendants of the Vikings are usually calm, polite, nice people.
 By the way I see something similar about the descendants of the Huns -- Chuvash people (they still keep a R-Turkic language which is similar to the Hunnic language) -- mostly nice, polite people.
 But it's not strange. It's normal people to adopt new behavior. For example, if your grandfather used to drink a lot, why you should follow this bad habit? You can become a person with healthier life style. :)

2273
 Yes, also that very small language -- spoken only by about 70 000+ people -- the Faroese language.

 So, you're a sort of Viking girl.  :)

2274
 Especially when there are aggressive countries ruled by one person (or a few people).

2275

If you don't give a refuge to a person who is unwilling to be a murderer then it's just a support for the one who compels him to kill

(and an assistance in turning a pacifist into an involuntarily murderer)

by Geser Kurultaev

  Things are very clear - most people around the world don't want to kill, even when killing is legal (during the wars) and when someone begins to forcibly mobilize them for war it is quite natural that most of these people do not want to become killers and/or at least do not want to risk their lives. Some of these people will, also naturally, try to avoid the hell of war by seeking asylum in another country. These (fugitives trying to escape the mobilization) are more or less pacifists. (Everyone who refuses to be part of war, regardless of his motives, is against war, therefore he or she serves peace more than war, ergo he or she is to some extent a pacifist).
  It would seem, in this situation, that any normal country should help those people who do something good (they refuse to become murderers or accomplices to murdering) to be accepted. However, something absurd, unexpected, illogical and even inhuman is happening right at this part of the process -- they are denied access in some countries! Immediately the simple question arises: "Refusers except that they have no ordinary humanistic attitude and empathy towards these people (knowing that by refusing them they automatically condemn them to war or imprisonment, at minimum) do they aso haven't a simple pragmatic logic?" I immediately clarify my question with the simple fact ((which obviously eluded the refusers), that when you return so many pacifists, then a large part of them (those who do not commit a suicide or do not end up in prisons) will be forcibly turned into involuntarily soldiers (i.e. potential killers or aiding in the killing), which will make exactly the one who mobilizes them stronger, with more military resources, and accordingly the war will last longer, and even if he does not win, the longer war will bring more death, maiming, economic, social and other suffering! Is it so complicated if you don't have enough humanism and empathy, at least to have sound logic and then to realize that it makes your enemy stronger by giving him back more army? Or will it just turn out to be that those conspirators are right when claim that in fact many of those people in power have another logic and interest: they want a longer war and all their anti-war and pacifism speeches are just a mask? No matter what their motives are, it's definitely true that to kick back a pacifist; not giving asylum to an unwilling to kill is a support for the one who forces him to kill and a form of assistance in turning the pacifist into a someone who commits suicide, a prisoner or an involuntarily killer.

2276

Да не дадеш убежище на неискащ да убива е подкрепа за онзи, който го принуждава да убива

(а и съдействие за превръщането на пацифист в недоброволен убиец)

от Гесер Курултаев

  Нещата са пределно ясни - повечето хора по света не искат да убиват, дори когато убиването е законно (по време на война) и когато някой започне насилствено да мобилизира за война съвсем естествено е повечето от тези хора да не искат да стават убийци и/или поне да не искат да си рискуват живота. Част от тези хора също съвсем естествено ще се опита да избегне адът на войната като потърси убежище в друга държава. Тези, бягащите от мобилизацията, са в по-малка или по-голяма степен пацифисти (всеки, който отказва да бъде част от война, независимо от мотивите си, е против войната, следователно обслужва повече мира, отколкото войната, ерго той или тя е до някаква степен пацифист). Изглежда, при това положение, всяка нормална държава би трябвало да съдейства на тези хора, които правят нещо добро (отказват да стават убийци или съучастници на убиването) да бъдат приети. Обаче точно тук се случва нещо абсурдно, неочаквано, нелогично, та дори и нехуманно - отказва им се достъп от някои държави! Веднага възниква простият въпрос: "Отказващите освен, че нямат обикновено хуманистично отношение и емпатия към тези хора (знаейки, че като им откажат ги обричат автоматично на война или минимум затвор) дали нямат и елементарна прагматична логика?" Веднага пояснявам въпроса си с простия факт (който явно убягва на отказващите), че като върнеш толкова много пацифисти, то голяма част от тях (тези, които не се самоубият или не попаднат в затворите) ще бъдат насилствено превърнати в недоброволни войници (сиреч, потенциални убийци или съдействащи на убиването), което ще направи точно този, който ги мобилизира по-силен, с повече военен ресурс, а съответно войната ще се проточи по-дълго и дори той да не победи, по-дългата война ще донесе повече смърт, осакатявания, икономически, социални и други страдания! Толкова ли е сложно, ако нямаш достатъчно хуманизъм и емпатия, поне да имаш здрава логика и да разбереш, че така правиш врагът си по-силен връщайки му повече армия? Или просто ще се окажат прави онези конспиратори, които твърдят, че всъщност много от властимащите имат друга логика и интерес: от по-дълга война и всичката им антивоенност и пацифизъм са просто една маска? Независимо какви са им мотивите, определено вярно е, че да върнещ пацифист; да не дадеш убежище на неискащ да убива е подкрепа за онзи, който го принуждава да убива и съдействие за превръщането на пацифиста в самоубиец, затворник или недоброволен убиец.

2277
 I know this because I learned that they're part of the so-called Germanic languages. Icelandic, Dutch... including English -- all are Germanic ones. Most of the nowadays Norwegian speakers are just descendants of Vikings.

2279
 I'd bet on the money. Once you're rich (and clever) you'll lose weight, you'll improve your style, you'll choose the healthiest food, drinks, places and at the end of the day you'll get the same or more what some handsome person like Sean O'Pry can afford. :)

2280
 Amazing! This is what I teach the people all the time -- try to be the best version of yourself (or if you can't, at least, be a better version of yourself). 8)

Your ad here just for $1 per day!

- - -

Your ads here ($1/day)!

About the privacy policy
How Google uses data when you use our partners’ sites or apps
Post there to report content which violates or infringes your copyright.