2416

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / JBx = one-sided thinking

« on: August 26, 2022, 04:19:55 AM »

Most of the JBxs are produced by one-sided thinking

  I think that most of these JBxs ("Just be x"s) are products of one-sided thinking. I'll explain it directly.
 It's rare when only one (just "x" something) thing may provide you with the sufficient attractiveness (if you haven't something else). For example, if we're talking about JBR ("Just be rich") it's (almost every time) enough; it's almost impossible to see a single rich man (except those volces or standardcels among the rich people). But all those JBW ("Just be white"), JBB ("Just be black") and so on are usually myths (known as "copes" in the incelosphere). For example, if a white (or black, yellow) man is just white and lacks of other traits (good IQ, morality, job, looks, achievements, etc.) it's nearly impossible to find someone who will just like him because of his whiteness or blackness, or yellowness... Even females who do prefer whites (or blacks, etc.) still will search for something more (at least personality and/or looks... often -- material possessions, money...) You know very well that many of the the present females are pickier than those years, decades, centuries and epochs ago.
 The same goes for "JBT" ("Just be tall"), "JBY" ("Just be young") and so on.
 Some of these "JBx"s are, in fact, collective (i. e. they don't express only one quality like "whiteness" or "height"), for instance, "JBC" ("Just be Chad"/"Just be Chang"). A Chad (Chang, Tyrone, etc.) is an attractive person (he is not just white/just black/just yellow, he is not just tall, he is not just young, etc.) who is strong, tall, handsome, masculine, successful (at least in 1-2 areas), popular (at least in his school, company, work place, district, street...)
 My advice is to be careful when you read something like "Just be x" or "Just do x" because usually just 1 thing or just 1 activity isn't enough. As many of the incels know, there are plenty of platitudes like "Just take a shower (and you'll find a girl-friend)." or "Just hit the gym (and you'll ascend)." which are basic and necessary but usually not enough if you use only them.

2417

Other languages / Една от най-големите "петици" в китайската лотария

« on: August 26, 2022, 01:34:23 AM »

 Ами допълвам темата "Колко се печели от китайската лотария?" с нещо, което не се среща често. Става дума за петиците (както знаете, аз така условно наричам втората по големина печалба - познати всички червени числа, без синьото и реално носеща названието "二等奖", т. е. "втора награда" при познати общо шест числа; това си е буквално "шестица", но при 6/33, не при 6/49). Ето една от най-големите "петици" (т. е. втори награди) от китайската лотария (поне според моя опит досега). Тя възлиза на 619546 юана (което по курса в момента е около 177376 лева).
 Този път петицата (втората награда) е толкова голяма, защото сравнително малко хора са я улучили (уцелили) - само 34 петици, което е доста скромно число за Китай.
 Ето цялата информация:

第22098期开奖结果 开奖日期：2022-08-25 21:15:00
02 03 04 06 21 33 05
本期一等奖：14注，每注6,203,690元
本期二等奖：34注，每注619,546元

Този път "шестиците" (които се назовават "一等奖" - "първа награда") или първите награди са 14 (сравнително доста) и затова и сумата е не кой знае колко голяма (6203690 юана, което по курса в момента е около 1776116 лева).
 Това е. Ние нямаме нищо от този тираж. Само 1 уцелено число. Обаче играем упорито, няма отказване!

2418

Other languages / Re: Търговия с канадски долари

« on: August 25, 2022, 07:10:52 PM »

 Какво ли си помислиха редовните читатели на този трейдърски блог? Сигурно, че вече сме се озовали в някакъв трейдърски провал. Уви, нещата не стоят точно така. Днес (този следобед) трейднахме успешно (на сметка) канадските долари! Печалбата е 6,61 юана което се равнява на 1,89 лева по курса в момента. Малко, но "на сметка".
 Доста почакахме докато успяхме, но най-важното е, че наистина успяхме и с това трейдване.
 Сега остана да видим какво ще става с австралийските долари, новозеландските долари и еврата.

2419

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / Re: "Being an incel is a mindset"

« on: August 25, 2022, 06:43:53 PM »

 It is a wrong definition because it is valid only for the fakecels (many of those self-proclaimed incels). When someone is objectively without home and lives under a bridge he's a homeless person and his homlessness is an objective fact not just a mindset. When someone is lacking attractiveness and despite of his many tries he can't find even one woman to agree being his girl-friend, lover, wife or something like this (for example the so-called "friends with benefits") then this person is an incel (with incel mindset or without incel mindset). There are incels with incel mindset and incels without incel mindset (like many of those incels in denial who don't know that they're incels or doubt it). The analogy with the wealth -- there are poor people with poverty mindset and poor people without poverty mindset but all of them are objectively poor (i. e. they're without some significant material possessions and with low incomes or without any income).
 The mindset is important, it's a factor that can help you or fail you but it's a subjective thing which isn't equal to the objective state of the inceldom, poverty and many others.

2420

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / Re: Banned in incels.is? Welcome here in "Normal Incels" (Incels without hate)

« on: August 25, 2022, 05:44:08 PM »

 Maybe she will be interested in our inceldom discussions and will stop the spamming. Or maybe it's just a spambot which will be banned soon (as hundreds of others during these years here).
 For now, just give her (it?) one more chance which is the last chance to become a good inceldom board member or a good omnilogy forum member...

2421

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / Re: Genetics - Personal efforts - Individual's taste

« on: August 24, 2022, 04:10:27 AM »

 I like to be real and honest with my followers, readers and people who spend time to learn something here. So, I'll illustrate it with my recent experience. As I told you already in that post I'm becoming more and more good at different sports (I develop different skills -- martial arts since I was 5 y. o. till now and recently more bodybuilding, fitness, aerobics, yoga, etc.) and I spend hours day by day to improve my force, speed and body's image. (Of course I don't neglect my intellectual hobbies like learning more about psychology, anthropology, Altaistics, Sinology and so on.) And, as a result, now I'm looking better than let's say 10 years ago (I can't compete with my youngest self when I was 24 for example but I look much better than when I was 36). So, due to this improvement (which many incels will just call "gymmaxx") I can see the positive outcomes when it comes to receiving likes, attention, interest.
 Years ago there weren't females who will say even a "Hi!" to me. But today (in fact, yesterday  ) when I had a long 3-hours walk in different city's areas (boulevards, streets, schools, beaches and a park) I met at least 5 young women and a few middle-aged women who greeted me or showed their interest in another way. (By the way, I'm glad to inform you that a female nearcel who followed my advises -- to lose weight, to limit her unhealthy habits, to color her white hair, to change her style and to socialize a bit more -- get married and she's not a single female nearcel anymore.) These two concrete examples are here to make you more confident that via right personal efforts and right socialization you have more chances to ascend.

2422

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / Genetics - Personal efforts - Individual's taste

« on: August 24, 2022, 03:32:53 AM »

About the Relationship Genetics - Personal efforts - Individual's taste

  Let's start with this triplets experiment (triplets thought experiment). The triplets have got one and the same DNA (although there are some environmental factors that could switch certain genes throughout a triplet’s lifetime), i. e. the same genetics (so they are identical).
 Now let's suppose that they were average people, separated for some years (because they were adopted by three different adoptive parents/families). The first triplet was adopted by foodies (gastronomes) who don't like sports. He's becoming an obese person. The second one was adopted by an average family who raised him as an average person (not overweight, but also not having a ripped body). The third one was adopted by health and fitness freaks who made him to be a person with good-looking skin, muscular body and hygienic looks.
 Now, if they go to have a long walk along the beach and meet the there around 100 females, guess what will be the outcome? 
 1. The first triplet will receive around 0% to 1% likes. (There are those rare cases when present days females like and do prefer obese males.)
 2. The second triplet will receive around 5% likes.
 3. The third one will receive 20% likes.
 If you illustrate it with dots, it looks like:
 .
 .....
 ....................
 Let's now think of some another environment, like these triplets do the same but in a place where the females' individual tastes are different (for example, if the triplets are white they go to a country where many of the locals prefer whiter skins and white race or, the opposite, if they're yellow they go to a country where many of the locals are fans of all those K-pop, J-pop, Q-pop guys or just like males who remind them of Bruce Lee, Jet Lee, Bolo Yeung, Donnie Yen and so on). There (in that kind of new environment, where the individual tastes are more beneficial for them) the outcome may be like:

1. 5%
2. 40%
3. 90%

.....
........................................
..........................................................................................

Let's continue this thought experiment with incel-tier triplets. If they're something like average incels (let's say 2/10 incels) then the expectations may be like:

1. 0%
2. 0%
3. 2%

(in the first environment)

and

1. 1%
2. 10%
3. 20%

(in the second environment).

 For all those incels and noncels who didn't understand it, let's think of all this in another way (from a typical male incel perspective using some of the incels' slang words):
 Imagine that there are female triplets. They've got 100% the same genetics but the first one started to eat a lot and didn't sport, the second one just remain the same and the third one healthmaxxes and gymmaxxes her. So, at the end, you're seeing a so-called landwhale, an average Becky and a Stacylite. Who are you going to like most?
 Well, most of the incels do not like obese females and the first triplet is not going to receive many likes. Some (to many) incels do prefer Beckies (average looking girls because they want someone closer to their looks and/or they worry that too pretty females are more difficult to be with). So the average looking triplet will receive more (or the most in some cases) likes. And the prettiest triplet will receive the most (or at least will be "the second best") likes.
 

So, what kind of conclusion we may make?

 I think that the most reasonable conclusion is:
 1. The genetics (genome; DNA) is something that you can't control. It's a constant. This gives you basis but later it's not the one and only factor.
 2. The personal efforts (and life choices, orientations, deeds, etc.) are a "game changer". A very important factor. Depending on you minn yourself or maxx yourself (you're becoming a worse version of yourself or a better version of yourself) the outcomes are different. Your attractiveness  and your personal efforts are just directly proportional.
 3. The environment (location; concrete people, socio-economical and cultural conditions) is the second very important game changing factor.
 Hence, even the genetic factor is unavoidable and basic we, if we have a metapilled (objective, scientific and balanced) thinking, should say that we shouldn't over exaggerate it. We have to pay more attention to the other two factors (the personal efforts and the individuals' tastes) where we have full control or some control (we have full control of what we can improve, maxx in ourselves (like gymmaxx, studymaxx, healthmaxx, moneymaxx, etc.) and we can influence our luck via meeting more people and/or going to more places, i. e. socialmaxx, geomaxx, etc.)

2423

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / Re: Different Topics and Answers to a Foreigner in China who blocked me in 微信

« on: August 23, 2022, 10:31:19 PM »

 Looks like the same one.

2424

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / Re: What are these landwhales?

« on: August 23, 2022, 02:54:24 AM »

 I don't like slangs like these. They're kind of sizeism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sizeism). But usually people who are obese and can't deal with the weight loss are lacking the knowledge how to count the calories and/or lazy do become sporty. There are also those obese people who doesn't care about or deny their obesity.
 Something useful: "How everyone can lose weight 100% naturally and 100% successfully" https://www.amazon.com/everyone-lose-weight-naturally-successfully-ebook/dp/B086RHP18Y.

2425

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / That real "Maybe he roped" problem

« on: August 23, 2022, 12:34:52 AM »

About the "Maybe he roped" problem

(Mostly caused by the so-called "roping" (suicide) subcultural incelospherian phenomenon

  The life isn't easy and it's getting harder for the poorest people around the world in the recent years. Many people, especially when they lack something important (like love, what is the incels' case) are getting more desperate and in some cases more suicidal (deeply unhappy and/or depressed and likely to commit suicide). They need support, understanding, some kind of real help! But when instead of these (support, understanding and real help) the incels (and all the rest of the desperate people) receive only (or mostly) attacks, rudeness plus perpetual statements like "It's over.", "Never began.", "There is no any hope for the incels." with all those rope (roping) memes, then this is nothing but a reinforcement of the suicidism amongst the incels who participate in all those pessimistic (a.k.a. "blackpilled") communities. If we use the incelospherian slang -- the  "ropefuel" reinforces the suicides.
 Long time ago, when I was in the university, the rhetorics teacher decided to make an exercise (a rhetoric exercise which is a form of training used to prepare the philosophy students to practically apply rhetorical skills in public speaking, debate, persuasion, politics, philosophy and all other fields in which rhetoric can be useful) about the suicide. It was something like "Pro-suicide or anti-suicide" (in nowadays' terminology you can think of it as "pro-euthanasia arguments" VS "anti-euthanasia arguments"). The university students in my group had to form (choose) two groups -- the "pro-suicide group" or the "anti-suicide group". I decided that there should be a "neutral group" which will be "pro- or anti- it depends..." I'm telling you this just to know that I am objective and I don't think that the only right position is "anti-euthanasia" and "anti-suicide". So, I am not a part of the "the oppressive system in which suicidal people experience forms of injustice and violence" (See "Suicidism: A new theoretical framework to conceptualize suicide from an anti-oppressive perspective" by Alexandre Baril). I was, from the very beginning (1993/1994) when we discussed this problem in the university a person who defends the critical suicidology.
 But, as far as, most of the inceldom cases (and problems) are solable (able to be solved) I disagree with all those pessimistic, pro-suicide reinforcing thoughts and behavior blackpillismic incels (and self-proclaimed incels, fakecels, nearcels, noncels and others)! They just make incels, self-proclaimed incels, fakecels, nearcels and other failed in love (and relationships) people to become more suicidal than they will become usually and this is already a problem because it leads people with chances to believe that they're chanceless and then they make wrong life/death choices.
 Incels (and other similar people like nearcels, etc.) who are more positive, realistic (like learning more about the metapill theory and how to escape the inceldom) can't easily commit suicides.
  And now, concretely about this "Maybe he roped" topic.
 "Maybe he roped." is a sort of standard response to an observation that some incel (or perceived as an incel) has been absent from the incelosphere (incels social groups, chat groups, forums, etc.) for a long time (or just when someone deemed to be on the inceldom spectrum has not given a sign of life online and offline for a long time).
 What's wrong with these responds (replies; comments)?

• They reinforce the pessimistic and suicidal thinking. They imply that if a person is absent online he "maybe roped", the same as there are no other dozens of reasons like the person is busy with something else, tired of all that blackpillism (pessimism), decided to self-improve (maxxing) and hence staying away from all of these discouraging communities...
• They don't even think of (or don't dare) to suppose that he ascended (escaped the inceldom; found a girlfriend, a lover, a wife...) In fact, in some cases they may be banned for this kind of statements and when themselves sometimes succeed to ascend (and want to keep their accounts active) they have to keep secret about it because ex-incels are unwelcome.

As an advice: when you're depressed don't read pessimistic blackpill materials, focus more on the realistic redpill and the scientific, objective metapill; give yourself more time and try more to maxx yourself; don't minn yourself; after some years the situation may be totally different and all of you to have more chances than now. Don't kill yourself rashly because you can't unkill (revive) yourself.

2426

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / What is "subhuman" (an incels' slang term) and why I am against it

« on: August 21, 2022, 03:20:09 AM »

About the term "subhuman"

  It's not the nazi, racist term "subhuman" ("Untermensch"). It's another one, a comparatively new incels' term, which is often used (ironically or even seriously) by incels most often to describe themselves, but in some cases also to describe others.
 Depends on the context, it can have multiple meanings like "Incels not look human", "Incels are not considered as humans by others". In some rare cases some incels consider themselves better than other people and call them "subhuman".
 After you got the meanings of this term now let me show you an article of mine where I explain why do I disagree this term to be used for describing an incel or another human being: The incels calling themselves "sub-human" are wrong.

2427

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / Re: That "mog" problem

« on: August 21, 2022, 02:35:15 AM »

 Mostly it's useless (unless it's not a motivation for you to try to improve yourself -- for instance you're looking at somebody who is having better body and you're not just thinking "He mogs me!" but immediately starting to think of a better diet, better physical exercises, more sports and so on.)
 When it comes to mogging (a.k.a. "amogging") I often think about this photo: -- Bruce Lee and Van Williams. I'm sure there are many incels who're going to say that Van Williams mogs Bruce Lee (mostly because he's taller than Bruce Lee) but I can't see how it is a problem once Mr Lee has a better built body, better martial skills and better popularity (at least now -- almost everyone knows Bruce Lee but who knows who was the actor Van Williams, especially the ones who're not from the USA?)
 So here are my 2 good suggestions when you feel you're a "moggee" (or a "mog-victim"):
 

• Use it as a motivation; as a challenge to get better in this mog-area. For example, he's lean, you're fat. Start a weight loss plan; he has bigger muscles and you're skinny. Start a bodybuilding activity!
• If you can't do anything about the certain mogging (for example he's tall and you're short or he has hair and you're bald) or if you don't like to compete in this certain field (for example his English is better than yours but you dislike learning English) then you can just compensate with something else. Some examples: you can compensate your shortness with gymmaxxing and your baldness with artmaxxing; you can compensate your poor English with learning Japanese or Spanish, Korean or Portuguese... (if the languages are not "your cup of tea" then learn some new skill like yoga or playing guitar).

There are many options. Don't let the mogging to discourage you; let it to motivate you becoming a better you.

2428

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / Re: That is why we should be incels without hate (and supportive)

« on: August 21, 2022, 01:28:27 AM »

 The problem of this person is that he uses a misogynist term when he means "woman", "female", "girl" (he calls the females "toilets"). So, I do agree with his opinion that incels should be positive towards each other but because in this incel board we only promote and support the normality and we're against the sexism in any form I had to point out that calling a woman or a girl "toilet" is wrong and not acceptable.

2429

A forum for incels who are normal people (no terrorists, no rapists, no racists, no pedophiles, no haters and so on) / Re: Different Topics and Answers to a Foreigner in China who blocked me in 微信

« on: August 21, 2022, 12:55:33 AM »

 Just DON'T doxx him or others!
 Low IQ -- yes, normie (normal) -- not sure. Well, if you mean the looks -- I'd say, he's a typical "Tanner" (for those who doesn't know the terminology, it's a "5" (on the decile chart). A Tanner fits between a Melvin (a low-tier Norman), a Norman and a Brad.)
  To be honest, yes, there are some people who after years realize that I was right and the decent ones even coming to search me and to say "Sorry!" or to thank me for being the one who showed them that they're wrong and they can improve (to become more knowledgeable, more polite and balanced and more understanding others, and the world.)

2430

Eastern things / 불닭 (Buldak) -- a Chicken dish from Korea

« on: August 19, 2022, 03:33:40 AM »

Buldak (불닭)

  불닭 (buldak) is "fire chicken" in Korean. It's a Korean dish which is a spicy chicken dish.